ext_70383 ([identity profile] eirias.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] eirias 2006-10-25 01:04 pm (UTC)

These are a really interesting couple of notes.

I feel like the statement "power has to go somewhere" ought to be justified. How does one calculate the power associated with a given election? How do we know that it's conserved across all possible versions of that election? I still feel like there's something missing here.

I like your argument for the electoral college, though I will note that proponents of fairness in California still won't be happy at how much *more* the system advances the political power of those in Wyoming -- the willingness to shoot yourself in the foot if it prevents your neighbor from getting more than you is a fundamental aspect of human psychology, as far as I can tell.

Another thing about the electoral college, now that I think of it -- doesn't it increase voter power but lower the stakes over which that power operates? You're basically getting a larger share of x/537 of the outcome for the presidency (or whatever) instead of a smaller share of the outcome for the presidency. Is this a good tradeoff? I'm not an expert in this, so forgive me if my questions are dim :).

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting