I can sort of see how it'd be fun to get the weird widow pages. You really miss that with the online journals.
1955? Heck, we don't usually read stuff from before 1995... It's "dated." And usually there's a newer, better study that refutes it. :P Though doctors keep rediscovering things that were well-proven in 1930 but no one bothers to look back that far, so maybe they really should, eh?
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
(no subject)
Date: 2005-02-19 10:16 pm (UTC)1955? Heck, we don't usually read stuff from before 1995... It's "dated." And usually there's a newer, better study that refutes it. :P Though doctors keep rediscovering things that were well-proven in 1930 but no one bothers to look back that far, so maybe they really should, eh?