Yup. I was dismayed to read a 1960 article that presaged a number of the objections people have written books about wih regard to a topic that didn't even exist in 1960. It's like, jeez, modern people, can't you at least be creatively wrong?
(Though I hear that viewed through the lens of a developmental psychologist, reading some natural philosophy is the same way. Sigh.)
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
(no subject)
Date: 2005-02-19 10:19 pm (UTC)(Though I hear that viewed through the lens of a developmental psychologist, reading some natural philosophy is the same way. Sigh.)