Naming update
Jul. 28th, 2006 11:38 amGraham, as our lovely JP suggested, went to the DMV yesterday without Social Security paperwork to get the license. He got most of the way through the process without question... until it came to the point where they needed to put the new name actually in the system.
Graham: "Just confirming -- I want to be GLast, First Middle ELast."
"What? Oh, we have you down as ELast GLast, First Middle."
"That's not right."
"OK, hang on." *tries some stuff*
"Not working." *tries some stuff again*
"Have you been to the Social Security Administration yet?" Uh-oh. Graham tells the story.
Guy is sympathetic, but: "I wonder whether this software checks their database and requires a match in order to do this?" Gives up; Graham comes home with a license in what is patently the wrong name. Now what?
On Monday he will have a car and he will try to go to the SSA and work it out again, but I fear that the problem will only be worse, because now he's going to want to change to a name that's very clearly not on his driver's license. And now he thinks he's going to be on a bunch of watch lists for rapid-fire name changes. I say that's malarkey because a quick glance at the substance will make it clear that it's a bureaucratic screwup, but then again common sense is a whole lot less common than malarkey when dealing with watch lists.
Sigh. The whole thing is stupid and wouldn't have happened without a sexist infrastructure. I so rarely encounter such obvious sexism that it always takes me by surprise, even though I know other people's experiences are different.
I also think that the DMV dude's explanation for why it wasn't working was just plain wrong. There was also no entry for ELast Glast, First Middle -- and yet that worked out just fine. I think "a DMV database made on the cheap way too long ago and implemented without adequate staff training" probably has more to do with it...
Graham: "Just confirming -- I want to be GLast, First Middle ELast."
"What? Oh, we have you down as ELast GLast, First Middle."
"That's not right."
"OK, hang on." *tries some stuff*
"Not working." *tries some stuff again*
"Have you been to the Social Security Administration yet?" Uh-oh. Graham tells the story.
Guy is sympathetic, but: "I wonder whether this software checks their database and requires a match in order to do this?" Gives up; Graham comes home with a license in what is patently the wrong name. Now what?
On Monday he will have a car and he will try to go to the SSA and work it out again, but I fear that the problem will only be worse, because now he's going to want to change to a name that's very clearly not on his driver's license. And now he thinks he's going to be on a bunch of watch lists for rapid-fire name changes. I say that's malarkey because a quick glance at the substance will make it clear that it's a bureaucratic screwup, but then again common sense is a whole lot less common than malarkey when dealing with watch lists.
Sigh. The whole thing is stupid and wouldn't have happened without a sexist infrastructure. I so rarely encounter such obvious sexism that it always takes me by surprise, even though I know other people's experiences are different.
I also think that the DMV dude's explanation for why it wasn't working was just plain wrong. There was also no entry for ELast Glast, First Middle -- and yet that worked out just fine. I think "a DMV database made on the cheap way too long ago and implemented without adequate staff training" probably has more to do with it...
(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-28 05:40 pm (UTC)Sadly, I'm sure you're right about the incompetence there. Meanwhile, G has a passport, right? That ought to help in explaining the situation to Social Security, who in my experience are among the very few US entities that actually take passports seriously as ID.
There is one reason why he's probably safe from any watch list worries: agencies still don't talk to each other, so the chances are no-one outside the state DMV will ever know about the interim, wrongly-named licence he has right now.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-28 06:09 pm (UTC)I wonder if it would help if I went in to show the way my name appears? Probably not, is my guess :/.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-28 05:50 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-28 06:07 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-28 06:24 pm (UTC)My brother has always had two official middle names. Since we don't call him by his given name anyway, he unofficially has three. (My parents made up for not giving me one at all to start.)
(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-28 06:56 pm (UTC)(Of course, my Dad didn't try to change his - I can only imagine how much more confused people might have been 30 years ago...)
(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-28 07:18 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-28 06:51 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-28 10:30 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-28 07:09 pm (UTC)Me: So what do you want to do about your last name?
Her: I'll just take your last name.
Me: Cool.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-28 10:10 pm (UTC)(I will say that people like y'all were much easier to address stuff to when sending out wedding invitations. Blended families are the worst.)
(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-28 10:32 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-28 10:35 pm (UTC)