eirias: (Default)
[personal profile] eirias
Have you ever overheard snippets of a conversation on the bus or in some other public space that makes you really curious what the rest of it was about?

There's an academic version of this experience: when you're reading a photocopied article in a two-page-per-side format, take a look at the "widow" page of the article that preceded or followed it in print. Sometimes it's a fun distraction from what you're actually supposed to be reading.

Interesting, odd, and/or funny widows in my stack:

* A review of "The Secret Self," (by psychoanalyst Theodor Reik) that concludes thusly: "It is with regret that one must, in the face of this, accuse Reik of a major modern crime - guilt by free association."
* "Haptic integration of object properties: texture, hardness, and planar contour" by Klatzky and colleagues
* "Categorical perception of nonspeech chirps and bleats," by Pastore and colleagues
* Something which appears to be a screed against nonparametric statistics
* Something about eyelid conditioning
* Something with an abstract in French about the role of relative adjectives (e.g. "big") in semantic memory
* A complaint that a particular term in cognitive psychology is "so vague and ambiguous as to be virtually meaningless" (who'd've thunk it?)
* Something involving name recognition, including an appendix with all the experimentally-presented names, including such beauts as "Spike Poorhard" and "Rupert Chirney"
* Something about implicit learning, which, hm, maybe I should go back and get
* "A process model of posthypnotic amnesia," by Huesmann and friends
* An ad for a book entitled, "Ultimate Computing: Biomolecular Consciousness and NanoTechnology" ... in 1988

Journal readers, what are some of the good widows in your stack?

(no subject)

Date: 2005-02-20 02:09 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] drspiff.livejournal.com
Thought I'd chime in with a comment on one big advantage of paper over online jounrals. That is that the paper journals have often been annonted by the readers as kind of the low tech version of a wiki. At least that's the way it worked until about 5-10 years ago in department astronomy libraries... if you had something to contribute to an article, you jotted in pencil in the margin. This is why I really like academic libraries... there almost always ends up being good stuff jotted in the margin.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-02-21 12:56 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] eirias.livejournal.com
Interesting!

Our department library kind of sucks and hasn't been updated AFAICT since about 1994, and people don't really write notes in the journals at the main campus library, but it's a cool idea.

My advisor is always embarrassed about the notes in the margins of her journals and books. I don't know why.

Profile

eirias: (Default)
eirias

December 2023

S M T W T F S
     12
3456789
10111213141516
1718 1920212223
24252627282930
31      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags