Choice and coercion
Aug. 23rd, 2005 08:45 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
It's ethics time!
It's a familiar story: You're a teller at a bank and a guy comes in with a loaded gun and says, "Give me all your money or else I'll shoot." Ostensibly, he's offering you a choice between cooperation and death. However, ethically, most people do not consider this to be a real choice. Because the alternative is so noxious, it's said, it is not actually an alternative; this situation counts as forcing a person to do something against his will.
What I'm wondering is, how noxious does the "or else" have to be for the above to hold? Does it have to be lethal, or even physical? What is the line between choice and coercion?
It's a familiar story: You're a teller at a bank and a guy comes in with a loaded gun and says, "Give me all your money or else I'll shoot." Ostensibly, he's offering you a choice between cooperation and death. However, ethically, most people do not consider this to be a real choice. Because the alternative is so noxious, it's said, it is not actually an alternative; this situation counts as forcing a person to do something against his will.
What I'm wondering is, how noxious does the "or else" have to be for the above to hold? Does it have to be lethal, or even physical? What is the line between choice and coercion?
(no subject)
Date: 2005-08-23 10:12 pm (UTC)Lets say a sales person tells me I can pay with cash or credit and I have no cash on me. That option is unviable to me and I pretty much have to go with credit. The sales person didn't manipulate the options in order to make me do one thing over the other. The sales person probably doesn't care either way and may not know that one option is not reasonable for me. I wouldn't call that coercion though. Maybe I'm just arguing semantics. I'm not sure.
(The Icon is from Scary-Go-Round. A webcomic.)
(no subject)
Date: 2005-08-23 10:21 pm (UTC)