[BBC] Chiropraxis 'has few benefits'
Mar. 22nd, 2006 06:49 am(I had to invent a word because it doesn't look like there is a word meaning "stuff chiropractors do," so chiropraxis it is until someone tells me otherwise.)
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/4824594.stm
According to this study (which was a meta-analysis from the looks of it), chiropraxis has no effect on non-back-related ailments and about the same effect on back-related ailments as conventional treatments. (Which I have to say doesn't speak too well of it, since as far as I know there's not a whole heck of a lot that can be done about back problems short of surgery, which is risky and doesn't always help.)
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/4824594.stm
According to this study (which was a meta-analysis from the looks of it), chiropraxis has no effect on non-back-related ailments and about the same effect on back-related ailments as conventional treatments. (Which I have to say doesn't speak too well of it, since as far as I know there's not a whole heck of a lot that can be done about back problems short of surgery, which is risky and doesn't always help.)
(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-22 01:13 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-22 01:32 pm (UTC)The power of belief can have impressive results...
(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-22 02:57 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-22 06:19 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-22 08:33 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-23 01:31 am (UTC)Not that I'm saying the study is crap, but doctors are generally not fond of chiropractics.