(no subject)

[eirias]

Tangential to an experience one of my friends is having with weight and weight loss, and inspired by some cool sculptures I saw at our campus art museum the other day, I want to mention something: I don't think attractiveness bears a simple monotonic relationship to weight. This is true even when you exclude the obviously-scary anorexics. I think that whether or not a body looks good has a lot less to do with size than it has to do with its having nice lines, for lack of a better way to put it. This is going to depend a lot on the particular frame your body has, and (when clothed) on how you dress it. Some people don't look great carrying any "extra" weight around, but some people do, and some of those people would look worse, IMO, if they got down to a "thin" size.

This is independent of health, of course -- people should think about that first, not about how hot they look at a given weight, and I think the health benefits of serious overweight are worth noting (though they are not, perhaps, the reason it has become an Issue in modern America; but I digress) -- but I think it bears mentioning.

EDIT: Err, make that health problems associated with serious overweight. Righty-o...

Comments

Go Directly to First

[sagittalbreast.livejournal.com]

All day yesterday I thought about responding to this post. But if I did, I would have to switch academic fields, go into psychology and write a freakin' book on the whole collapsed spider web of thoughts I have on human attractiveness (normalized values & the media, racism, art, shame [the bible], fantasies about traveling back in time, and my own extreme fondness for female homo sapiens).

But, instead, I won't say anything, except that I just did. In baseball, that's called a balk, so please leave the bat and take your base (adjust crotch and spit).